Wikipedia:不要包含原始资料的副本
维库，知识与思想的自由文库
 |
本页被视为维库的一项指引。本指引为一些或许多维基编者原则接受。但本指引并非正式方针。自由地更新此页，不过在进行较大修改之前请在讨论页发起讨论。 |
| 維基百科的指引 |
|---|
| 內容 |
| 分類 |
| 編輯 |
| 討論 |
| 態度 |
| 格式 |
| 格式手冊
請參見方針 |
在维基百科中不要包含原始资料的副本（特定的文章，地图和其他非常有用的图片）。如果原始资料篇幅较大，可以考虑将其放在维基教科书。 古腾堡计划和维基文库也是发布资料全文内容的合适选择。
避免在条目中完整地列出条约，新闻稿，演讲稿和长篇引言等等。应该做的是，比如对于某个条约的条目，可以给出条约的概述同时包括一条条约全文的外部链接。相对较短的文稿全文则可以在文章中全部引用。比如，国歌相关条目可以列出国歌的歌词；又如，篇幅短小的诗歌也可以包括在其相关的条目中。
[编辑] 引述其他参考文献
复制其他版权已经过期的百科全书内容或以其作为写作的基础都是完全允许的。但是直接复制其他版权未过期或版权状况不明的文献则是不合适的。
不管怎样，能做的都不仅仅是把文字拷贝到条目中了事，而是应该对内容进行尽可能的修订：改写以保证中性观点、只收录适合百科全书的内容、添加链接和格式排版等等。
[编辑] 对版权资料的合理使用
While fair use of copyrighted primary sources may be acceptable at Wikipedia under limited circumstance, posting the same sources at Wikisource may not be fair since Wikisource is to archive works published elsewhere like a library, making the possibility of fair use extremely limited. Most, if not all, copyrighted works posted there without any free license have been tagged and deleted as copyright violations.
Therefore, when writing an article at Wikipedia about a copyrighted primary source, please follow Wikipedia:Fair_use#Fair_use_policy carefully before including the copyright source. However, please do not copy the same copyrighted source to Wikisource without proper permission while fair use is extremely limited there. In case an article posted here is proposed to be moved to Wikisource, please check its copyright status as well.
For example, older lyrics of the Internationale have become in the public domain, but the modern version by Billy Bragg (Briton) is still copyrighted, so please do not copy his modern version to Wikisource until its copyright has expired (after his lifetime plus 70 years pursuant to British law) or permission been granted.
For images as parts of copyrighted primary sources, fair use may be acceptable here under very limited circumstances, but never claim fair use of copyright images at Wikimedia Commons since that site is to host free use images, making fair use inapplicable there.
[编辑] 对采用非商业版权文献的使用
Because Wikipedia, Wikisource, and Wikimedia Commons all use GFDL allowing commercial reuses and derivative works, Wikimedia Commons refuses copyrighted images with non-commercial licenses and the Wikimedia Foundation has considered that copyrighted primary sources with non-commercial licenses are to be excluded from Wikisource ([1], [2]). If you want to pursue copyrighted primary source documentation with non-commercial licenses, please consider other web sites with compatible licenses. For example, Project Gutenberg accepts others' copyrighted works if properly licensed, but it does not use GFDL and downstream users are responsible for themselves to ensure that their reuses are copyright-okay.
